Are You A Target For Your Boss?...OR How Not to Terminate an Employee

John Pate was the Chief Building Official for a Township north of Peterborough for 10 years, and had a clean employment record.

As a result of an amalgamation in 1998, a new Township was created and John Pate became a building inspector in the new Building Department. Mr. John Beavan became the new Chief Building Official for the new Township, and also John Pate's new boss.

It is of note that John Beavan, before becoming a building official, had been a police staff sergeant for many years prior to his retirement from the police force.

On March 26th, 1999, with instructions from the Township's Chief Administrative Officer, John Pate was summarily terminated from his job by his boss John Beavan the former police officer.

At the time, John Pate was told he was being fired because of discrepancies uncovered with respect to building permit fees, and the Municipality believed that John Pate had pocketed the fees for himself.

Then Beavan made a very strange offer to John Pate. If Pate was prepared to walk away from his job and resign without his severance pay or any other money from the Municipality, the Municipality would not contact the police.

John Pate asserted his innocence and refused to quit. As a result of that decision, the Municipality passed on information to the OPP.

Interestingly, the OPP officer who investigated the complaint was reluctant to lay charges because of what he viewed as inadequate evidence.

From the Municipality's point of view, if John Pate was convicted of a criminal offence the Municipality would not have to pay him any severance pay or damages for wrongful dismissal. On the other hand, if he was not guilty, well...that was a whole other kettle of fish and the Municipality might have to come up with a whack of money to satisfy John Pate's claim in a civil trial, for wrongful dismissal.

The Municipality decided in all its wisdom to override the investigating officer, and exerted pressure through those higher in command within the OPP. Ultimately, criminal charges were laid to be tried in a criminal trial.

In response to that, John Pate commenced a civil action against the Municipality, claiming damages for wrongful dismissal and malicious prosecution.

The evidence provided to the OPP by the Municipality for the criminal trial was that the Municipality had searched its records and could not find any records concerning building permits the Municipality knew should have been issued by John Pate.

The Municipality claimed, in short, that John Pate had issued building permits to various applicants without opening a file and simply pocketed the fee for himself without leaving a record of the transaction. That does sound like theft.

At the criminal trial, which lasted 4 days, the court heard what the Municipality and in particular, what the former police staff sergeant John Beavan failed to tell the OPP.

John Beavan failed to disclose to the OPP that the Municipality had lost a large number of files including building permit files, and it was 'common knowledge' to the municipal employees as well as to the Chief Administrative Officer of the Municipality that during the relocation of township offices many files and records had been permanently lost.

The former police staff sergeant, John Beavan, who fired John Pate on behalf of the Municipality, also failed to tell the OPP that he had retained John Pate's journal showing his monthly reconciled entries relating to building permit applications and building permit application fees. At trial, the former police officer, Beavan, could not tell the court what had happened to the journal, nor could he produce it.

John Pate was acquitted of all charges in the criminal trial and was free to proceed with his civil action against the Municipality, claiming damages for wrongful dismissal from his job, as well as damages for malicious prosecution pursued by the Municipality through the criminal court system.

During that civil trial against the Municipality, John Beavan, the former police staff sergeant acknowledged that he only turned over the statements and evidence to the OPP that building permit files concerning John Pate were missing but not that many other files and records were also missing. He admitted at the trial that he now realized, belatedly, the police may have only relied upon his limited disclosure, notwithstanding that he himself would not have done so had he been the investigating officer.

The judge at the civil trial for wrongful dismissal found it "...Most troubling...that Mr. Beavan, in most of the statements, went to great length to indicate that he had conducted

"Comprehensive searches of the files and records in building office and cannot locate any evidence of an application for a permit or issued building permit".

Everyone employed by the Defendant [Municipality] was well aware that records of this nature had gone missing as a result of the municipal office move. This was never disclosed [to the police] and should have been disclosed by the Municipality to the investigating officer."

In the end the court found that "...there was more than ample evidence to conclude that the Township initiated the criminal proceedings against Mr. Pate without reasonable and probable grounds to believe that he committed thefts and did so maliciously in order to avoid civil liability for the termination of his employment."

The court awarded John Pate over $825,000.00 in compensation, damages and costs, including $550,000.00 in punitive damages against the defendant The Corporation of the Township of Galway-Cavendish and Harvey.

Tragically, John Pate died before the final decision was handed down by the court.

Lessons to be learned:

•1. Employment law is very tricky. You may not know whether you are being fairly treated by your employer and it is always best to obtain an opinion from a law firm who has employment law experience.

•2. Employers should always be wary before they let an employee go. It is far better to obtain legal advice well before an employee is given notice of termination.

We have lawyers at our firm who deal extensively with employment law.

Give us a call.

Talk to us.

We can help.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

shameless self promotion

  • Quinn Ross Takes Office As President Of The Ontario Bar Association

    The Ontario Bar Association (OBA) is pleased to announce Quinn Ross as the 83rd President of the OBA.

    Ross, Managing Partner of The Ross Firm, with offices in Goderich, Kincardine and Stratford, has been an active member in senior roles on the OBA board since 2012.

    Read More

  • Ross Firm Golf Tourney In Support of Huron Women’s Shelter a Swinging Success

    On behalf of the Huron Women’s Shelter and The Ross Firm P.C., we say “THANK YOU” to our many Sponsors and Donators for their outpouring of generosity and support for the annual Take a Swing Against Violence Golf Tournament held at Goderich Sunset Golf Club.

    Read More

  • Who needs a Will? You do!

    Our guests can explain why. Are you single and renting? A new Family? Or Homeowner? Enjoying your Golden Years? We all need a Will and our guest speakers will show you the why and the way.

    Read More

  • Take a Swing Against Violence

    On June 21, 2017, the Huron Women’s Shelter Second Stage Housing and Counselling Services, Board of Directors and The Ross Firm will be hosting the Taking a Swing Against Violence golf tournament at the Goderich Sunset Golf Course.

    Read More

View All

Send Us An Email. Talk To Us. We Can Help.

To schedule a consultation with one of our experienced lawyers, contact The Ross Firm online or give us a call toll free at 888-567-4917.

Contact Us

Goderich Office
144 Courthouse Square
Suite 100
Goderich, ON N7A 1M9

Toll Free: 888-567-4917
Fax: 519-524-8438
Map & Directions

Stratford Office
1 Ontario Street
2nd Floor
Stratford, ON N5A 3G7

Toll Free: 888-567-4917
Fax: 519-814-5533
Map & Directions

Kincardine Office
943 Queen Street
Kincardine, ON N2Z 2Y8

Phone: 226-396-5532
Fax: 226-396-5533
Map & Directions